Bid Bench
#construction

Evaluating Construction Tech for Tech-Averse Teams

The construction industry is built on tangible results: concrete poured, walls framed, and finishes installed. By contrast, “Software” is abstract. For many General Contractors and their teams, adopting new technology feels like a distraction from the “real work” of building.

However, as projects grow in complexity, “working harder” is no longer a viable strategy for managing data. The firms that scale are those that adopt technology—but only technology that respects the industry’s need for speed and simplicity.

If your team is “tech-averse,” you cannot force them to use a complex system. You must choose technology that prioritizes Time-to-Value.

The “Time-to-Value” Metric

Time-to-Value (TTV) is the amount of time it takes a new user to realize a tangible benefit from the software.

For a tech-averse team, the TTV must be almost instantaneous. If the software makes their job harder on Day 1, they will never use it on Day 10.

Three Criteria for “Appropriate” Technology

When evaluating a new tool for your firm, apply these three clinical tests:

1. Does it mimic the current workflow?

The best software doesn’t ask you to change how you build; it asks you to change how you store what you build. If your team currently uses email and Excel, the software should feel like a more organized version of those tools, not a completely different language.

2. Is there “Friction-Free” collaboration?

If your subcontractors or team members have to download an app or create a password to interact with the software, it will fail. The software must allow users to engage through familiar channels, like email.

3. Does it eliminate “Double Work”?

Technology should never add steps to a process. It should automate existing ones. If you have to type a bid into the software and into your spreadsheet, the software is a failure. It should parse the data and update the budget in one action.

The iPad Test: Mobility and Accessibility

For a “tech-averse” superintendent or project manager, the computer in the office is a chore. The real work happens in the field, standing in the dirt or on a slab. Therefore, the ultimate test for any construction software is the iPad Test.

If a team member can’t pull up a budget, check a bid exclusion, or approve a change order while standing in front of a subcontractor on-site, they will revert to their old ways (writing notes on scrap lumber). The software must be mobile-first and incredibly responsive. It shouldn’t require high-speed office Wi-Fi to load a basic PDF. When information is available at their fingertips in the field, old-school PMs start to see the software as a tool—like a level or a tape measure—rather than an administrative burden.

Simplicity as a Professional Feature

At Bid Bench, we believe that “Simplicity” is the most important feature for a General Contractor. We built our platform to be used by people who would rather be on a job site than behind a screen.

Technology should work as hard as you do.
Choose a system designed for the reality of the construction site. Start your free trial at app.bidbench.com/signup.

← Back to Articles